The advent of smartphones and mobile internet allowed for the creation of projects that can be used in the physical spaces they inhabit. There are several aspects that have been created using this idea. Some, like PhillyHistory.org, allows users to see the past around them on their smartphone as they walk around the city. Some institutions have created companion applications for smartphones that visitors can use as they walk through established exhibits in a museum, as this exhibit has shown. This type of history has the potential to be groundbreaking, as seen with the Histories of the National Mall, where the information is sent in a way that does not require downloading an app beforehand. By running the project over Internet protocols, this type of project is not limited by changing smartphone capabilities.
I explored my home area of Manassas, VA on Historypin and the result were what I was expecting. The few pins that appeared were focused on the Civil War battlefield and the area around the downtown train station. My experience with Historypin was very simple, in that it showed a few old photographs and a few lines of text related to it. The battlefield photos were interesting in that it overlayed the older photo on top of a current image at the same spot. This allowed me to see how the area has changed since the original photo was taken. I got the sense that these photos on the battlefield were trying to show how the area looked in the past as people are currently walking through the area. There are not that many uploaded at the moment, maybe 5 or 6 images, so it did not take me long to go through all of them.
The reading about oral history have shown that with current technology, it can have both positive and negative implications. The Web allows researchers to both post their interviews to a wider population as well as find more people to interview, which allows them to broaden the scope of their project. The major drawback is that this process can be very complex. Ensuring that visitors to these projects are able to view, hear, and use the information presented can be a major hurdle. Accessibility is another concern, because transcribing the interviews is a costly and time-consuming exercise.
The use of oral history has already helped my project, as I was able to find interviews related to an exhibit from the Smithsonian that I can add as a resource.
One of the things I noticed with local history sites was that funding was a major hurdle. Several articles mentioned that money came through grants one year that were not renewed, and the developers were left with a half finished project. I viewed these projects as more in line with teaching others about the specific location or group and to spread that knowledge to others. This type of site is much more intensive on the creation aspect of the project, with gathering artifacts and conducting research, etc., where it takes a wealth of time and money to complete.
Others local history projects utilized the communities they were researching to help gather materials that went into the project, and I feel this aspect can help my own. My project focuses on a particular group, and since I plan to include a forum component, I can easily include a topic where visitors can suggest ways to improve the exhibit portion of the site.